Wednesday, August 9, 2017

HIGH COURT OF KERALA ON REGISTRATION OF AGREEMENT DEEDS


HIGH COURT OF KERALA ON REGISTRATION OF AGREEMENT DEEDS




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

      FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2016/24TH ASHADHA, 1938

                  WP(C).No. 17141 of 2016 (P)
                  ----------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
-------------

            SANJUDAS N.S.,
            MANAGING DIRECTOR, SANROYAL BUILDERS &
            CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD., ROHINI BHAVAN,
            INDIRA NAGAR, PEROORKADA P.O.,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 005.


            BY ADVS.SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS
                   SMT.E.U.DHANYA
                   SRI.RAJITH DAVIS

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

         1. STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS  SECRETARY,
            TAX DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

         2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,
            VANCHIYUR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 035.

         3. DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL),
            CHEMBUKKAVU P.O., THRISSUR - 680 020.

         4. SUB REGISTRAR,
            MUNDUR P.O., THRISSUR - 680 541.


            BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.JOSEPH GEORGE

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
       ON 15-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:


msv/

WP(C).No. 17141 of 2016 (P)
----------------------------

                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

P1   TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED DATED 01-04-2016 EXECUTED BY THE
     PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF BOSE VARGHESE

P2   TRUE COPY OF THE TOKEN REGISTRATION ALONG WITH
     ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 01-04-2016

P3   TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. C135/2016 OF 4TH RESPONDENT


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------
                           NIL

                                      //TRUE COPY//


                                      P.S.TO JUDGE


Msv/



                     P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                 WP(C).No.17141 of 2016-P.

                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

               Dated this the 15th day of July, 2016.

                         J U D G M E N T


           The petitioner is the Managing Director of a company.

The company of the petitioner entered into an agreement with

one Bose Varghese for sale of 4.08% of undivided share in a

property of the company. When the agreement was presented

for registration, the fourth respondent refused to register the

same on the ground that Bose Varghese has not subscribed his

signatures in the agreement. Ext.P3 is the communication issued

by the fourth respondent to the petitioner. In Ext.P3, it is stated

that the document can be registered only if the same is signed by

the buyer also. According to the petitioner, there is no

requirement in law that the buyer should also subscribe his

signatures in the agreement and therefore, the conduct of the

fourth respondent in refusing registration of the document is

unsustainable. The petitioner, therefore, challenges Ext.P3

communication issued by the fourth respondent in the writ

WP(C).No.17141/2016-P.


                                         2

petition.  He also seeks direction to the fourth respondent to

register the agreement.

           2.      Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

           3.      Ext.P1 is the photocopy of the agreement for sale

presented by the petitioner for registration before the fourth

respondent. Ext.P1 is styled as a document executed by both the

seller as also the buyer. The opening paragraph of Ext.P1 reads

thus:

            "This agreement is executed on 01/04/2016 on this First day of

            April Two Thousand and Sixteen at Thrissur.


            BY M/s Sanroyal Builders & Contractors Private Limited

            (PAN:AAW CS3106N), a company duly incorporated under the

            Companies Act 1956 having its corporate office at Rohini Bhavan,

            Indira Nagar, Peroorkada P.O., Pin:695005 represented by its

            Present Managing Director Sanjudas N.S. (PAN: CKNPS6594J),

            Aged 36 Thirty Six years, business, S/o Narayanan Narayna das

            residing at House No:5/417 of Thiruvananthapuram Municipal

            Corporation, Rohini Bhavan, Peroorkada P.O., Pin: 695005,

            Peroorkada Desom and Village, Thiruvananthapuram Thaluk and

            District (hereinafter referred to as the OWNER which expression

            shall wherever the context, admits, mean and include his heirs,

            successors, nominees and assignees of the FIRST PART), TO AND

            IN FAVOUR OF Bose Varghese (PAN No.AMTPBO254E), AGED 38

            Thirty Eight Years, Business, S/o Thanikkal Varghese Residing at

            House No: 234/53 of Ayyanthole Gramapanchayath, Thanikkal

            House, Ayyanthole P.O., Pin:680003, Ayyanthole Desom,

            Ayyanthole Village, Thrissur Thaluk, Thrissur District (hereinafter

WP(C).No.17141/2016-P.


                                        3

           referred to as the PURCHASER which expression shall wherever

           the context, admits, mean and include his heirs, successors,

           nominees and assignees of the OTHER PART).


Ext.P1 contains the photograph of Bose Varghese. The terms of

Ext.P1 agreement creates rights and obligations on both the

seller and the buyer. The learned counsel for the petitioner

submitted that there is no provision in the Registration Act and

the Rules made thereunder which authorises the sub registrar to

refuse registration of documents of this nature.

           4. Though the Registration Act does not contain any

specific provision dealing with the circumstances under which the

Registrar can refuse to register a document, Section 71 of the

Act indicates beyond doubt that the Registrar has the power to

refuse registration in appropriate cases. Section 71 of the said

Act reads thus:

                  "71. Reasons for refusal to register to be
           recorded:-     (1) Every Sub-Registrar refusing to register a
           document, except on the ground that the property to which it
           relates is not situate within his sub-district, shall make an order
           of refusal and record his reasons for such order in his Book
           No.2., and endorse the words "registration refused" on the
           document; and, on application made by any person executing or
           claiming under the document, shall, without payment and
           unnecessary delay, give him a copy of the reasons so recorded.

                    (2)     No registering officer shall accept for registration
           a document so endorsed unless and until, under the provisions
           hereinafter contained, the document is directed to be registered.

WP(C).No.17141/2016-P.


                                      4



                   (3)     No registering officer shall accept for registration
           any document involving transfer of property including contract for
           sale of immovable property belonging to or vested in the
           Government of Kerala or public sector undertakings operating in
           the State or local self Government institutions unless it is
           accompanied by a no objection certificate issued by an officer
           authorised by the State Government in this behalf."


Rule 191 of the Registration Rules (Kerala) stipulates some of the

circumstances under which the registration of a document can be

refused by the Registrar. This Court has held in Noble John v.

State of Kerala (2010(3) KLT 914) that the circumstances

stipulated in Rule 191 is not exhaustive and the Registrar can

refuse registration in appropriate other cases as well.

           5.    As far as the present case is concerned, as

indicated above, the agreement sought to be registered is an

agreement creating mutual rights and obligations. It is styled as

an agreement executed by the seller and the buyer.                             The

photograph of the buyer is affixed in the document. The buyer

has not subscribed his signatures in the document.                       In other

words, the document presented for registration is an incomplete

document. Further, it is a case where the executing party does

not appear before the Registrar as required by Section 34 of the

WP(C).No.17141/2016-P.


                                 5

Registration Act. Rule 191(VII) empowers the Registrar to refuse

registration, if the executing party does not appear before the

Registrar. Admittedly, the buyer has not appeared before the

Sub Registrar for registration. In the circumstances, the fourth

respondent is perfectly justified in refusing registration of the

document.      The writ petition, therefore, lacks merit and the

same is, accordingly, dismissed.




                                                  Sd/-
                                          P.B.SURESH KUMAR,
                                                JUDGE.


Kvs/-




                           // true copy //




SUPREME COURT ON FRAUDULANT SALE





                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA


                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


              SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.13917 OF 2009


Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd.                                         .....Petitioner


Vs.


State of Haryana & Anr.                                                   ....Respondents





                                         J U D G M E N T




R. V. Raveendran J.


        By   an   earlier   order   dated   15.5.2009   [reported   in  Suraj   Lamp   & 


Industries Pvt.Ltd. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. -  2009 (7) SCC 363],   we


had   referred   to   the   ill   -   effects   of   what   is   known   as   General   Power   of 


Attorney Sales (for short `GPA Sales') or Sale Agreement/General Power of 


Attorney/Will   transfers  (for   short   `SA/GPA/WILL'   transfers).   Both   the


descriptions are misnomers as there cannot be a sale by execution of a power


of attorney nor can there be a transfer by execution of an agreement of sale


and a power of attorney and will. As noticed in the earlier order, these kinds


of   transactions   were   evolved   to   avoid   prohibitions/conditions   regarding


certain transfers, to avoid payment of stamp duty and registration charges on




                                              2





deeds   of   conveyance,   to   avoid   payment   of   capital   gains   on   transfers,   to


invest   unaccounted   money   (`black   money')   and   to   avoid   payment   of


`unearned increases' due to Development Authorities on transfer.





2.     The  modus   operandi  in   such   SA/GPA/WILL   transactions   is   for   the


vendor   or   person   claiming   to   be   the   owner   to   receive   the   agreed


consideration,   deliver   possession   of   the   property   to   the   purchaser   and


execute the following documents or variations thereof:


       (a)   An   Agreement   of   sale   by   the   vendor   in   favour   of   the

       purchaser confirming  the terms of sale, delivery of possession

       and   payment   of  full   consideration   and   undertaking   to   execute

       any document as and when required in future.

                                             Or

       An   agreement   of   sale   agreeing   to   sell   the   property,   with   a

       separate affidavit  confirming receipt of full price and delivery

       of   possession   and   undertaking   to   execute   sale   deed   whenever

       required.


       (b) An Irrevocable General Power of Attorney by the vendor in

       favour   of   the   purchaser   or   his   nominee   authorizing   him   to

       manage,   deal   with   and   dispose   of   the   property   without

       reference to the vendor.

                                             Or

       A   General   Power   of   Attorney   by   the   vendor   in   favour   of   the

       purchaser or his nominee authorizing the attorney holder  to sell

       or   transfer   the   property   and   a   Special   Power   of   Attorney   to

       manage the property.


       (c)   A   will   bequeathing   the   property   to   the   purchaser   (as   a

       safeguard   against   the   consequences   of   death   of   the   vendor

       before transfer is effected).




                                                  3





These   transactions   are   not   to   be   confused   or   equated   with   genuine


transactions   where   the   owner  of  a   property   grants  a   power  of  Attorney   in 


favour of a family member or friend to manage or sell his property, as he is


not able to manage  the property or execute the sale,  personally. These are


transactions, where a purchaser pays the full price, but instead of getting a


deed of conveyance gets a  SA/GPA/WILL as a mode of transfer, either at


the instance of the vendor or at his own instance.





Ill-Effects of SA/GPA/WILL transactions





3.     The   earlier   order   dated   15.5.2009,   noted   the   ill-effects   of   such


SA/GPA/WILL transactions (that is generation of black money, growth of


land mafia and criminalization of civil disputes) as under:


       "Recourse to `SA/GPA/WILL' transactions is taken in regard to freehold

       properties, even when there is no bar or prohibition regarding transfer or

       conveyance of such property, by the following categories of persons:

           (a) Vendors with imperfect title who cannot or do not want to execute

               registered deeds of conveyance.



           (b)   Purchasers   who   want   to   invest   undisclosed   wealth/income   in

               immovable   properties   without   any   public   record   of   the

               transactions.   The   process   enables   them   to   hold   any   number   of

               properties without disclosing them as assets held.



           (c)   Purchasers   who   want   to   avoid   the   payment   of   stamp   duty   and

               registration charges either deliberately or on wrong advice. Persons




                                                     4





                who deal  in real  estate  resort to  these methods  to avoid  multiple

                stamp duties/registration fees so as to increase their profit margin.



       Whatever   be   the   intention,   the   consequences   are   disturbing   and   far

       reaching,   adversely   affecting   the   economy,   civil   society   and   law   and

       order.   Firstly,   it   enables   large   scale   evasion   of   income   tax,   wealth   tax,

       stamp   duty   and   registration   fees   thereby   denying   the   benefit   of   such

       revenue   to   the   government   and   the   public.   Secondly,   such   transactions

       enable   persons   with   undisclosed   wealth/income   to   invest   their   black

       money   and   also   earn   profit/income,   thereby   encouraging   circulation   of

       black money and corruption.



       This   kind   of   transactions   has   disastrous   collateral   effects   also.   For

       example,  when  the market  value  increases,  many vendors  (who effected

       power   of   attorney   sales   without   registration)   are   tempted   to   resell   the

       property taking advantage of the fact that there is no registered instrument

       or record in any public  office thereby cheating  the purchaser. When the

       purchaser under such `power of attorney sales' comes  to know about the

       vendors action, he invariably tries to take the help of musclemen to `sort

       out' the issue and protect his rights. On the other hand, real estate mafia

       many   a   time   purchase   properties   which   are   already   subject   to   power   of

       attorney   sale   and   then   threaten   the   previous   `Power   of   Attorney   Sale'

       purchasers from asserting their rights. Either way, such power of attorney

       sales indirectly lead to growth of real estate mafia and criminalization of

       real estate transactions."





It also makes title verification and certification of title, which is an integral


part   of   orderly   conduct   of   transactions   relating   to   immovable   property,


difficult,   if   not   impossible,   giving   nightmares   to   bonafide   purchasers


wanting to own a property with an assurance of good and marketable title.




                                              5





4.     This   Court   had   therefore   requested   the   learned   Solicitor   General   to


give suggestions on behalf of Union of India. This Court also directed notice


to States of Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh to give their views on the 


matter. The four states have responded and confirmed that SA/GPA/WILL


transfers required to be discouraged as they lead to loss of revenue (stamp


duty) and increase in litigations due to defective title.  They also referred to


some measures taken in that behalf. The measures differ from State to State.


In   general,   the   measures   are:     (i)   to   amend   Registration   Act,   1908   by


Amendment Act 48 of 2001 with effect from 24.9.2001 requiring documents


containing   contract   to   transfer   for   consideration   (agreements   of   sale   etc.)


relating to any immoveable property for the purpose of section 53A of the


Act,   shall   be   registered;   and   (ii)   to   amend   the   stamp   laws   subjecting


agreements of sale with delivery of possession and/or irrevocable powers of


attorney   in   favour   of   non-family   members   authorizing   sale,   to   the   same


stamp   duty   as   deed   of   conveyance.   These   measures,   no   doubt,   to   some


extent   plugged   the   loss   of   revenue   by   way   of   stamp   duty   on   account   of


parties having recourse to SA/GPA/WILL transactions, instead of executing


deeds   of   conveyance.   But   the   other   ill-effects   continued.   Further   such


transaction   which   was   only   prevalent   in   Delhi   and   the   surrounding   areas


have   started   spreading   to   other   States   also.   Those   with   ulterior   motives




                                             6





either   to   indulge   in   black   money   transactions   or   land   mafia   continue   to


favour   such   transactions.   There   are   also   efforts   to   thwart   the   amended


provisions by not referring to delivery of possession in the agreement of sale


and giving a separate possession receipt or an affidavit confirming delivery


of   possession   and   thereby   avoiding   the   registration   and   stamp   duty.   The


amendments to stamp and registration laws do not address the larger issue of


generation of black money and operation of land mafia. The four States and


the Union of India are however unanimous that SA/GPA/WILL transactions


should be curbed and expressed their willingness to take remedial steps.





5.       The  State  of  Haryana  has however  taken   a  further  positive  step   by


reducing the stamp duty on deeds of conveyance from 12.5% to 5%. A high 


rate of stamp duty acts as a damper for execution of deeds of conveyance for 


full value, and encourages SA/GPA/WILL transfers. When parties resort to


SA/GPA/WILL   transfers,   the   adverse   effect   is   not   only   loss   of   revenue


(stamp duty and registration charges) but the greater danger of generation of


`black' money.  Reducing  the  stamp   duty  on conveyance  to realistic  levels


will encourage public to disclose the maximum sale value and have the sale


deeds registered. Though the reduction of the stamp duty, may result in an


immediate reduction in the revenue by way of stamp duty, in the long run it




                                             7





will   be   advantageous   for   two   reasons:   (i)   parties   will   be   encouraged   to


execute   registered   deeds   of   conveyance/sale   deeds   without   any   under


valuation, instead of entering into SA/GPA/WILL transactions; and (ii) more


and more sale transactions will be done by way of duly registered sale deeds,


disclosing   the   entire   sale   consideration   thereby   reducing   the   generation   of


black money to a large extent. When high stamp duty is prevalent, there is a 


tendency   to   undervalue   documents,   even   where   sale   deeds   are   executed.


When properties are undervalued, a large part of the sale price changes hand 


by   way   of   cash   thereby   generating   `black'   money.   Even   when   the   state


governments   take   action   to   prevent   undervaluation,   it   only   results   in   the


recovery of deficit stamp duty and registration charges with reference to the 


market   value,   but   the   actual   sale   consideration   remains   unaltered.   If   a



property worth  `5 millions is sold for  `2 millions, the Undervaluation Rules


may enable the state government to initiate proceedings so as to ensure that


the deficit stamp duty and registration charges are recovered in respect of the



difference of `3 millions. But the sale price remains `2 millions and the black



money of `3 millions generated by the undervalued sale transaction, remains


undisturbed. 




                                                      8





6.     In   this   background,   we   will   examine   the   validity   and   legality   of


SA/GPA/WILL   transactions.   We   have   heard   learned   Mr.   Gopal


Subramanian,   Amicus   Curiae   and   noted   the   views   of   the   Government   of


NCT   of   Delhi,   Government   of   Haryana,   Government   of   Punjab   and


Government of Uttar Pradesh who have filed their submissions in the form


of affidavits.





Relevant Legal Provisions


7.     Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (`TP Act' for short)


defines `transfer of property' as under:




       "5.  Transfer   of   Property  defined   :   In  the   following   sections   "transfer   of

       property"   means   an   act   by   which   a   living   person   conveys   property,   in

       present or in future, to one or more other living persons, or to himself [or

       to   himself]   and   one   or   more   other   living   persons;   and   "to   transfer

       property" is to perform such act."   xxx  xxx




Section 54 of the TP Act defines `sales' thus:


       "Sale" is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised

       or part-paid and part-promised.


       Sale   how   made.   Such   transfer,   in   the   case   of   tangible   immoveable

       property of the value of one hundred rupees and upwards, or in the case of 

       a   reversion   or   other   intangible   thing,   can   be   made   only   by   a   registered 

       instrument.


       In   the   case   of   tangible   immoveable   property   of   a   value   less   than   one

       hundred   rupees,   such   transfer   may   be   made   either   by   a   registered

       instrument or by delivery of the property.




                                                     9





      Delivery   of   tangible   immoveable   property   takes   place   when   the   seller

      places   the   buyer,   or   such   person   as   he   directs,   in   possession   of   the

      property.


      Contract   for   sale.-A   contract   for   the   sale   of   immovable   property   is   a

      contract   that   a   sale   of   such   property   shall   take   place   on   terms   settled 

      between the parties.


      It does not, of itself, create any interest in or charge on such property."




Section 53A of the TP Act defines `part performance' thus :


      "Part   Performance.   -   Where   any   person   contracts   to   transfer   for

      consideration any immoveable property by writing signed by him or on his

      behalf   from   which   the   terms   necessary   to   constitute   the   transfer   can   be

      ascertained with reasonable certainty,


      and   the   transferee   has,   in   part   performance   of   the   contract,   taken

      possession   of   the   property   or   any   part   thereof,   or   the   transferee,   being

      already in possession, continues in possession in part performance of the

      contract and has done some act in furtherance of the contract,

           

      and the transferee has performed  or is willing to perform his part of the

      contract,




      then, notwithstanding that where there is an instrument of transfer, that the

      transfer has not been completed in the manner prescribed therefor by the

      law for the time being in force, the transferor or any person claiming under

      him  shall  be debarred  from enforcing  against  the transferee  and persons

      claiming   under   him   any   right   in   respect   of   the   property   of   which   the 

      transferee   has   taken   or   continued   in   possession,   other   than   a   right

      expressly provided by the terms of the contract :


      Provided that nothing in this section shall affect the rights of a transferee

      for   consideration   who   has   no   notice   of   the   contract   or   of   the   part

      performance thereof."






8.    We may next refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Stamp Act,


1999 (Note : Stamp Laws may vary from state to state, though generally the




                                                      10





provisions may be similar). Section 27 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 casts


upon   the   party,   liable   to   pay   stamp   duty,   an   obligation   to   set   forth   in   the 


instrument all facts and circumstances which affect the chargeability of duty


on   that   instrument.   Article   23   prescribes   stamp   duty   on   `Conveyance'.   In


many States appropriate amendments have been made whereby agreements


of   sale   acknowledging   delivery   of   possession   or   power   of   Attorney


authorizes the attorney to `sell any immovable property are charged with the


same duty as leviable on conveyance.





9.      Section   17   of   the   Registration   Act,   1908   which   makes   a   deed   of


conveyance compulsorily registrable. We extract below the relevant portions


of section 17.


        "Section 17 - Documents of which registration is compulsory- (1) The

        following documents  shall be registered, namely:--


                                    xxxxx


        (b) other non-testamentary instruments which purport or operate to create,

        declare,   assign,   limit   or   extinguish,   whether   in   present   or   in   future,   any

        right,   title   or  interest,   whether  vested   or  contingent,  of  the   value   of  one

        hundred rupees and upwards, to or in immovable property.

                                    xxxxx


        (1A) The documents containing contracts to transfer for consideration, any

        immovable   property   for   the   purpose   of   section   53A   of   the   Transfer   of

        Property   Act,   1882   (4   of   1882)   shall   be   registered   if   they   have   been

        executed   on   or   after   the   commencement   of   the   Registration   and   Other

        Related   laws   (Amendment)   Act,   2001   and   if   such   documents   are   not

        registered on or after such commencement, then, they shall have no effect

        for the purposes of the said section 53A.




                                                     11





Advantages of Registration


10.    In   the   earlier   order   dated   15.5.2009,   the   objects   and   benefits   of


registration were explained and we extract them for ready reference :


       "The Registration Act, 1908, was enacted with the intention of providing

       orderliness, discipline and public notice in regard to transactions relating

       to   immovable   property   and   protection   from   fraud   and   forgery   of

       documents   of   transfer.   This   is   achieved   by   requiring   compulsory

       registration of certain types of documents and providing for consequences

       of non-registration.


       Section 17 of   the   Registration   Act   clearly   provides   that   any   document

       (other than testamentary instruments) which purports or operates to create,

       declare,   assign,   limit   or   extinguish   whether   in   present   or   in   future   "any

       right, title or interest" whether vested or contingent of the value of Rs. 100

       and upwards to or in immovable property.


       Section 49 of   the   said   Act   provides   that   no   document   required   by

       Section 17 to   be   registered   shall,   affect   any   immovable   property

       comprised therein or received as evidence of any transaction affected such

       property,  unless it has been registered. Registration of a document  gives

       notice to the world that such a document has been executed.


       Registration   provides   safety   and   security   to   transactions   relating   to

       immovable   property,   even   if   the   document   is   lost   or   destroyed.   It   gives

       publicity and public exposure to documents  thereby preventing forgeries

       and   frauds   in   regard   to   transactions   and   execution   of   documents.

       Registration provides information to people who may deal with a property,

       as to the nature and extent of the rights which persons may have, affecting

       that  property.   In  other  words,  it  enables  people   to  find   out  whether  any

       particular property with which they are concerned, has been subjected to

       any legal obligation  or liability and who is  or are the person/s  presently

       having right, title, and interest in the property. It gives solemnity of form

       and perpetuate documents which are of legal importance or relevance by

       recording   them,   where   people   may   see   the   record   and   enquire   and

       ascertain   what   the   particulars   are   and   as   far   as   land   is   concerned   what

       obligations exist with regard to them. It ensures that every person dealing

       with   immovable   property   can   rely   with   confidence   upon   the   statements

       contained   in   the   registers   (maintained   under   the   said   Act)   as   a   full   and

       complete account of all transactions by which the title to the property may 

       be affected and secure extracts/copies duly certified."




                                                     12





Registration of documents makes the process of verification and certification


of   title   easier   and   simpler.   It   reduces   disputes   and   litigations   to   a   large


extent. 





Scope of an Agreement of sale


11.     Section 54 of TP Act makes it clear that a contract of sale, that is, an


agreement of sale does not, of itself, create any interest in or charge on such 


property.   This   Court   in  Narandas   Karsondas   v. S.A.   Kamtam   and   Anr.


(1977) 3 SCC 247, observed:


        A contract of sale does not of itself create any interest in, or charge on, the

        property.   This   is   expressly   declared   in   Section 54 of   the   Transfer   of

        Property  Act.   See  Rambaran  Prosad   v. Ram   Mohit   Hazra  [1967]1  SCR

        293.   The   fiduciary   character   of   the   personal   obligation   created   by   a

        contract   for   sale   is   recognised   in   Section 3 of   the   Specific   Relief   Act,

        1963, and in Section 91 of the Trusts Act. The personal obligation created

        by a contract of sale is described in Section 40 of the Transfer of Property

        Act as an obligation arising out of contract and annexed to the ownership 

        of property, but not amounting to an interest or easement therein."


        In   India,   the   word   `transfer'   is   defined   with   reference   to   the   word

        `convey'. The word `conveys' in section 5 of Transfer of Property Act is

        used   in   the   wider   sense   of   conveying   ownership...   ...that   only   on 

        execution of conveyance ownership passes from one party to another...."


In  Rambhau Namdeo Gajre v. Narayan Bapuji Dhotra  [2004 (8) SCC 614]


this Court held:


        "Protection   provided   under   Section 53A of   the   Act   to   the   proposed

        transferee is a shield only against the transferor. It disentitles the transferor

        from   disturbing   the   possession   of   the   proposed   transferee   who   is   put   in

        possession in pursuance to such an agreement. It has nothing to do with

        the ownership of the proposed transferor who remains  full owner of the




                                                     13





        property till it is legally conveyed by executing a registered sale deed in 

        favour   of   the   transferee.   Such   a   right   to   protect   possession   against   the

        proposed vendor cannot be pressed in service against a third party."





It is thus clear  that a  transfer   of  immoveable   property  by  way   of  sale  can


only be by a deed of conveyance (sale deed). In the absence of a deed of 


conveyance (duly stamped and registered as required by law), no right, title


or interest in an immoveable property can be transferred.




12.     Any contract of sale (agreement to sell) which is not a registered deed 


of conveyance (deed of sale) would fall short of the requirements of sections 


54 and 55 of TP Act and will not confer any title nor transfer any interest in


an   immovable   property   (except   to   the   limited   right   granted   under   section


53A of TP Act). According to TP Act, an agreement of sale, whether with


possession or without possession, is not a conveyance. Section 54 of TP Act


enacts that sale of immoveable  property can be made  only by a registered


instrument and an agreement of sale does not create any interest or charge on


its subject matter.





Scope of Power of Attorney


13.     A power of attorney is not an instrument of transfer in regard to any 


right,  title   or   interest   in   an  immovable   property.   The   power  of  attorney   is 




                                                        14





creation of an agency whereby the grantor authorizes the grantee to do the


acts   specified   therein,   on   behalf   of   grantor,   which   when   executed   will   be


binding on the grantor as if done by him (see section 1A and section 2 of the


Powers   of   Attorney   Act,   1882).   It   is   revocable   or   terminable   at   any   time


unless it is made irrevocable in a manner known to law. Even an irrevocable


attorney does not have the effect of transferring title to the grantee. In State 


of Rajasthan vs. Basant Nehata - 2005 (12) SCC 77, this Court held :


        "A grant of power of attorney is essentially governed by Chapter X  of the

        Contract   Act.   By   reason   of   a   deed   of   power   of   attorney,   an   agent   is

        formally appointed to act for the principal in one transaction or a series of

        transactions or to manage the affairs of the principal generally conferring

        necessary authority upon another person. A deed of power of attorney is

        executed by the principal in favour of the agent. The agent derives a right

        to use his name and all acts, deeds and things done by him and subject to

        the   limitations   contained   in   the   said     deed,   the   same   shall   be   read   as   if

        done by the donor. A power of attorney is, as is well known, a document 

        of convenience.


        Execution of a power of attorney in terms of the provisions of the Contract

        Act as also the Powers-of-Attorney Act is valid. A power of attorney, we  

        have   noticed   hereinbefore,   is   executed   by  the   donor  so  as   to   enable   the

        donee   to   act   on   his   behalf.   Except   in   cases   where   power   of   attorney   is

        coupled with interest, it is revocable. The donee in exercise of his power

        under  such power of attorney  only acts  in  place  of the donor subject of

        course to the powers granted to him by reason thereof. He cannot use the

        power of attorney for his own benefit. He acts in a fiduciary capacity. Any

        act of infidelity or breach of trust is a matter between the donor and the 

        donee."





An attorney holder may however execute a deed of conveyance in exercise


of the power granted under the power of attorney and convey title on behalf


of the grantor.




                                             15





Scope of Will




14.    A will is the testament of the testator. It is a posthumous disposition of


the estate of the testator directing distribution of his estate upon his death. It


is not a transfer  inter vivos. The two essential  characteristics of a will are


that it is intended to come into effect only after the death of the testator and 


is revocable at any time during the life time of the testator. It is said that so 


long as the testator is alive, a will is not be worth the paper on which it is


written, as the testator can at any time revoke it. If the testator, who is not


married, marries after making the will, by operation of law, the will stands 


revoked.   (see   sections   69   and   70   of   Indian   Succession   Act,   1925).


Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.





Conclusion


15.    Therefore, a SA/GPA/WILL transaction does not convey any title nor


create any interest in an immovable property. The observations by the Delhi


High Court, in Asha M. Jain v. Canara Bank - 94 (2001) DLT 841, that the


"concept   of   power   of   attorney   sales   have   been   recognized   as   a   mode   of


transaction" when dealing with  transactions by way of  SA/GPA/WILL are


unwarranted   and   not   justified,   unintendedly   misleading   the   general   public




                                              16





into thinking that SA/GPA/WILL transactions are some kind of a recognized


or accepted mode of transfer and that it can be a valid substitute for a sale


deed.  Such decisions to the extent they recognize or accept SA/GPA/WILL


transactions   as   concluded   transfers,   as   contrasted   from   an   agreement   to


transfer, are not good law.





16.     We   therefore   reiterate   that   immovable   property   can   be   legally   and


lawfully   transferred/conveyed   only   by   a   registered   deed   of   conveyance.


Transactions of the nature of `GPA  sales'  or `SA/GPA/WILL  transfers'  do


not convey title and do not amount to transfer, nor can they be recognized or


valid   mode   of   transfer   of   immoveable   property.   The   courts   will   not   treat


such transactions as completed or concluded transfers or as conveyances as


they neither convey title nor create any interest in an immovable property.


They cannot be recognized as deeds of title, except to the limited extent of


section 53A of the TP Act. Such transactions cannot be relied upon or made


the   basis   for   mutations   in   Municipal   or   Revenue   Records.   What   is   stated


above   will   apply   not   only   to   deeds   of   conveyance   in   regard   to   freehold


property   but  also   to   transfer   of  leasehold   property.  A   lease   can   be   validly


transferred only under a registered Assignment of Lease. It is time that an




                                              17





end is put to the pernicious practice of SA/GPA/WILL transactions known


as GPA sales.





17.    It   has   been   submitted   that   making   declaration   that   GPA   sales   and


SA/GPA/WILL transfers are not legally valid modes of transfer is likely to


create   hardship   to   a   large   number   of   persons   who   have   entered   into   such


transactions   and   they   should   be   given   sufficient   time   to   regularize   the


transactions by obtaining deeds of conveyance. It is also submitted that this


decision should be made applicable prospectively to avoid hardship.





18.    We   have   merely   drawn   attention   to   and   reiterated   the   well-settled


legal position that SA/GPA/WILL transactions are not `transfers' or `sales'


and   that   such   transactions   cannot   be   treated   as   completed   transfers   or


conveyances. They can continue to be treated as existing agreement of sale.


Nothing   prevents   affected   parties   from   getting   registered   Deeds   of


Conveyance to complete their title. The said `SA/GPA/WILL transactions'


may   also   be   used   to   obtain   specific   performance   or   to   defend   possession


under section 53A of TP Act. If they are entered before this day, they may 


be   relied   upon   to   apply   for   regularization   of   allotments/leases   by


Development Authorities.  We make it clear that if the documents relating to




                                              18





`SA/GPA/WILL   transactions'   has   been   accepted   acted   upon   by   DDA   or


other developmental authorities or by the Municipal or revenue authorities to


effect   mutation,   they   need   not   be   disturbed,   merely   on   account   of   this


decision.





19.    We make it clear that our observations are not intended to in any way


affect   the   validity   of   sale   agreements   and   powers   of   attorney   executed   in


genuine transactions. For example, a person may give a power of attorney to


his spouse, son, daughter, brother, sister or a relative to manage his affairs or


to  execute  a deed  of conveyance.  A person  may   enter  into a  development 


agreement with a land developer or builder for developing the land either by


forming   plots   or   by   constructing   apartment   buildings   and   in   that   behalf


execute an agreement of sale and grant a Power of Attorney empowering the 


developer   to   execute   agreements   of   sale   or   conveyances   in   regard   to


individual plots of land or undivided shares in the land relating to apartments


in favour of prospective purchasers. In several States, the execution of such


development   agreements   and   powers   of   attorney   are   already   regulated   by


law   and   subjected   to   specific   stamp   duty.   Our   observations   regarding


`SA/GPA/WILL   transactions'   are   not   intended   to   apply   to   such


bonafide/genuine transactions. 




                                            19





20.    We   place   on   record   our   appreciation   for   the   assistance   rendered   by


Mr. Gopal Subramaniun, Senior Counsel, initially as Solicitor General and


later as Amicus Curiae.





21.    As the issue relating to validity of SA/GPA/WILL has been dealt with


by this order, what remains is the consideration of the special leave petition


on its merits. List the special leave petition for final disposal.





                                                          .................................J

                                                                     (R. V. Raveendran)





                                                          .................................J

                                                                          (A. K. Patnaik)




                                                                                            

                                                          .................................J

                                                                         (H. L. Gokhale)

New Delhi;

October 11, 2011.